Division of Investment Management Requests Extensions of Deadlines for Mid-Sized Advisers and Private Fund Advisers

IA Watch is reporting that the Division of Investment Management has formally requested that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) move to next year the deadlines for mid-sized advisers (certain advisers with between $25 million and $100 million in assets under management) to switch to state registration and for private fund advisers with more than $150 million in assets under management to register with the SEC.  IA Watch states: “The formal request moves this closer to becoming reality, should the Commission act on it.”

Robert E. Plaze, Associate Director of the Division of Investment Management, had suggested that extensions to the first quarter of 2012 were a possibility in his April 8, 2011 letter to David Massey, President, North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. and Deputy Securities Administrator, North Carolina Securities Division.

“We anticipate that the Commission will complete its implementing rulemaking by July 21,2011 in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act, but expect in connection therewith that the Commission will consider providing additional time for investment advisers affected by these provisions to come into compliance.”

With respect to the switch of mid-sized advisers to state registration, Mr. Plaze’s letter noted that once the SEC  adopts the implementing rulemaking, the Investment Adviser Registration Depository system (lARD) will “require re-programming to accept advisers’ transition filings” and that they “understand that the re-programming process will take until the end of the year to complete.”  As a result, under consideration was the possibility that  “all SEC-registered advisers would be required to report their eligibility for registration with the Commission in the first quarter of 2012.”  He went on to say that, even if the implementing rulemaking is completed prior to July 21, 2011,  private fund advisers will need time to register and come fully into compliance with the accompanying obligations, and that they “expect that the Commission will consider extending the date by which these advisers must register and come into compliance with the obligations of a registered adviser until the first quarter of 2012.”

IA Watch‘s report is not surprising given recent reports in industry publications (including a May 2 report by IA Watch) that SEC staff members have indicated the expectation that the delays will go through.  One such statement was reported to have been made by Sara Crovitz, a Branch Chief in the Office of Chief Counsel in the Division of Investment Management, as  a participant in a DC bar luncheon panel discussion on “Cross Border Issues Affecting Investment Advisers in the World of  Dodd-Frank.”

Massachusetts Data Security Regulations – Technology Perspective

If you own or license personal information about a resident of the Commonwealth, you should already be familiar (and compliant, as of March 1, 2010) with the Massachusetts Data Security Regulations, set by The Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation (OCABR).

While the Regulations themselves are best explained by Mr. Patrick Shea of HedgeOp Compliance in an earlier post of this blog, let’s take a moment to look at practical approaches to meeting (and exceeding) the requirements outlined in the Regulations. I will focus my post on the technological aspects of the Regulations but make sure you address the non-technology pieces, including risk identification and assessment, employee training, maintaining proper documentation, etc.

I would like to introduce you to what I call the C.I.A. of your data: Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability. As a business owner or IT gate keeper you want to make sure that your data remains secured, accurate and readily available to your employees and investors. We will get back to data C.I.A. in a second.

Continue reading

N.Y. Hedge Fund Tax May Fall by the Wayside

Struggling to raise revenue for recession-hit New York in the face of a gaping budget shortfall, the New York State Legislature proposed in June a plan to collect additional income taxes from hedge fund managers with offices located in New York, but who live outside the state, by treating much of the compensation earned by these fund managers as ordinary income. However, this plan may have fallen by the wayside in the face of fierce industry criticism echoed by New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg.

Continue reading

HF Regulation Coming to Connecticut?

According to the Associated Press, lawmakers in Connecticut, may be gearing up to pass hedge fund legislation in their state.  Last year, the state legislature failed to pass a bill which would have required hedge funds and private equity firms to disclose certain conflicts of interest.  Some state lawmakers are looking to use that bill as a starting point for new hedge fund legislation.

Hedge fund regulation on the federal seems to be stuck in the Senate right now.  Although the house has already passed their financial reform bill (which includes hedge fund registration), the Senate version seems to be stuck.  It looks like some Connecticut legislators have gotten fed up with the slow progress and may take their own steps towards regulation for hedge funds in the state.

Massachusetts Extends Data Security Regulation Deadline Once Again

Data security regulations introduced by the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation (“OCABR”) have garnered attention this year for a couple reasons.  First, the Regulations are broadly written, covering any company that handles “personal information” of Massachusetts customers or employees (as you may have guessed, this will include companies located outside of Massachusetts).  Next, the Regulations continue to make headlines as the Massachusetts OCABR makes revisions and extends the compliance deadline.  The current compliance deadline is March 1, 2010. Continue reading