Division of Investment Management Requests Extensions of Deadlines for Mid-Sized Advisers and Private Fund Advisers

IA Watch is reporting that the Division of Investment Management has formally requested that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) move to next year the deadlines for mid-sized advisers (certain advisers with between $25 million and $100 million in assets under management) to switch to state registration and for private fund advisers with more than $150 million in assets under management to register with the SEC.  IA Watch states: “The formal request moves this closer to becoming reality, should the Commission act on it.”

Robert E. Plaze, Associate Director of the Division of Investment Management, had suggested that extensions to the first quarter of 2012 were a possibility in his April 8, 2011 letter to David Massey, President, North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. and Deputy Securities Administrator, North Carolina Securities Division.

“We anticipate that the Commission will complete its implementing rulemaking by July 21,2011 in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act, but expect in connection therewith that the Commission will consider providing additional time for investment advisers affected by these provisions to come into compliance.”

With respect to the switch of mid-sized advisers to state registration, Mr. Plaze’s letter noted that once the SEC  adopts the implementing rulemaking, the Investment Adviser Registration Depository system (lARD) will “require re-programming to accept advisers’ transition filings” and that they “understand that the re-programming process will take until the end of the year to complete.”  As a result, under consideration was the possibility that  “all SEC-registered advisers would be required to report their eligibility for registration with the Commission in the first quarter of 2012.”  He went on to say that, even if the implementing rulemaking is completed prior to July 21, 2011,  private fund advisers will need time to register and come fully into compliance with the accompanying obligations, and that they “expect that the Commission will consider extending the date by which these advisers must register and come into compliance with the obligations of a registered adviser until the first quarter of 2012.”

IA Watch‘s report is not surprising given recent reports in industry publications (including a May 2 report by IA Watch) that SEC staff members have indicated the expectation that the delays will go through.  One such statement was reported to have been made by Sara Crovitz, a Branch Chief in the Office of Chief Counsel in the Division of Investment Management, as  a participant in a DC bar luncheon panel discussion on “Cross Border Issues Affecting Investment Advisers in the World of  Dodd-Frank.”

Marketers to Public Plans in New York City and California Required to Register as Lobbyists

As of the beginning of 2011, investment advisers, as well as individuals and third-party firms, soliciting business from New York City or the State of California public pension plans must determine if they have any registration obligations under the lobbying laws of those jurisdictions and comply with any applicable requirements as soon as possible. These regulations have been imposed in the wake of pay-to-play scandals in both locales and are in addition to any obligations an investment adviser may have under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) pay-to-play rules. Continue reading

Group of International Regulators Publish Suggested Systemic Risk Data Requirements For Hedge Funds

Last week the International Organization of Securities Commissions’ (IOSCO) Technical Committee published the details of an agreed template for the global collection of hedge fund information, which it believes will assist in assessing possible systemic risks arising from the hedge fund sector.

The template (a copy of which is attached for your reference) was designed to create a comparable and consistent set of data to be collected by regulators from local hedge fund managers to monitor systemic risks and prevent gaps in regulatory reporting requirements. The data can then be exchanged amongst regulators and other competent authorities for the purpose of facilitating international supervisory cooperation in identifying possible systemic risks in the hedge fund sector.

The template, which was developed by the Task Force on Unregulated Financial Entities, contains eleven proposed categories of information. The proposed categories incorporate both supervisory and systemic data, and build on the data collection recommendations set out in the IOSCO Technical Committee’s Final Report on Hedge Fund Oversight, which was released in June 2009.

The list of data includes basic information such as the manager’s name, number of funds and equity owners; as well as the names of auditors, custodians, recent performance, redemptions, total assets under management and the value of long and short positions in different assets. Geographic spread, liquidity of a fund’s assets, the value of borrowings, net credit counterparty risk and the top 10 positions are also included.

The IOSCO Task Force has recommended that the first data gathering exercise should be carried out on a best efforts basis (given pending legislation in many jurisdictions) in September 2010.

Although the IOSCO Technical Committee recognizes that the legislative process is currently ongoing in many jurisdictions, it is publishing the template now to help inform any planned legislative changes currently being considered. As stated by IOSCO Technical Committee Chairman Kathleen Casey (who is also a U.S. SEC Commissioner):

“We recognize that the legislative process is ongoing in many jurisdictions and their outcomes could further influence the information needed to monitor systemic risk in the hedge fund sector, as well as who collects the data. Nonetheless, setting out these categories of information may help regulators in the assessment of systemic risk and help to inform the relevant legislative debates.”

It is unclear at this time whether or how the IOSCO disclosure template will inform or affect the ongoing Congressional debate on financial and regulatory reform, including whether it will impact the proposed hedge fund adviser legislation that was passed by the House in December and is currently pending in the Senate.

Compliance Reminder — Massachusetts Data Security Regulations Effective March 1, 2010

The Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation has issued Regulations, effective March 1, 2010, that will apply to any businesses (including advisory and asset management firms) who own or license personal information about a resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (i.e, your customers or your employees).  The focus of the Regulations is to ensure better protection of that personal information.  You can view the Regulations here.

Continue reading