Senator Dodd has agreed (for now at least) to drop the last minute provisions he added to the FinReg bill that would have weakened derivatives reform authored by Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.)
Over the past few weeks Sen. Lincoln, the chief advocate of the derivatives ban, has faced opposition from Wall Street, the White House, and members of her own party over a provision in her derivatives reform legislation that would force financial firms to spin off their derivatives trading desks into stand-alone entities.
Yesterday, in an eleventh-hour attempt to appease both friends and foes of the provision, Senator Chris Dodd quietly and without announcement proposed a compromise amendment that would preserve Lincoln’s original tough language, but postpone any action for two years so it can be studied.
And, more importantly, it would assign that study to a new council of regulators, headed by Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, whose members have already expressed serious reservations about Lincoln’s proposed spin-off measure. Senator Dodd did not consult with or notify Senator Lincoln (who was in Arkansas yesterday fighting for her Senate seat in a primary election) prior to proposing his amendment. Not surprisingly, Sen. Lincoln expressed surprise and dismay upon learning of Dodd’s last minute proposal. Moreover, Dodd’s compromise did not sit well with members of the banking community, who expressed worry that the two-year study period would introduce uncertainty that would create a chilling effect.
In the face of opposition from all sides, Dodd withdrew his proposal from the Senate bill this afternoon shortly after the cloture delay was announced. Dodd’s decision likely means that the financial regulatory reform will pass the Senate leaving Lincoln’s derivative reform plan untouched; however, Democratic leaders might revisit the issue when House and Senate meet to reconcile the differences between their two bills. It should particularly be noted that the House’s derivatives title is significantly weaker than the Senate’s, and the spin-off provision could prove to be a useful bargaining chip in the negotiation process.
Continue reading →