Bankrupt Hedge Fund Seeks to Recoup Losses From Goldman’s “Timberwolf” Deal

It has been reported that a bankrupt hedge fund is in talks with Goldman, Sachs & Co., to recoup losses it sustained in the “Timberwolf” securities deal.

invested approximately of $100 million in a $1 billion security Goldman packaged and sold as “Timberwolf” in Q1 2007.  If you have been following the Goldman Sachs Senate Subcommittee investigations this week you would have heard that this deal was criticized in in-house e-mails.  Namely, “Boy, that Timberwolf was one [$%&!] deal.”

The hedge fund is said to have lost approximately $56 million on the Timberwolf security. Goldman has not yet commented on its talks with the hedge fund.

As reported earlier on this blog, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a lawsuit April 16 against Goldman alleging that the firm secretly created investments designed to fail while a hedge fund manager, John Paulson, who helped package the deal, was betting against them.

As compliance professionals, this should stand as an acute reminder to train employees on the importance of using discretion in drafting and sending out e-mails and other electronic communications (among a whole host of other compliance related issues!).   While often tagged as a best practice, firms should implement an electronic communications (i.e., emails and instant messages) monitoring and review system.  People tend to forget that once an electronic communication is put out in cyberspace it can and may be used against (or for) you.  While training and monitoring can never stop someone from committing a fraud or potential fraud (and this is not to imply that Goldman is guilty in anyway — I’ll leave that decision to the courts!), it can certainly help catch it before it grows  into something much bigger.

SEC Charges Private Equity Firm in Kickback Scheme Involving New York Pension Fund

On April 15, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged a private investment firm and one of its affiliated entities for participating in a widespread kickback scheme to obtain investments from New York’s largest pension fund.

The SEC complaint alleges that Quadrangle Group LLC and Quadrangle GP Investors II, L.P. secured a $100 million investment from the New York State Common Retirement Fund. The investment came only after a then-executive at Quadrangle arranged for an affiliate to distribute the DVD of a low-budget film that former New York State Deputy Comptroller David Loglisci and his brothers had produced.

The SEC further alleges that the Quadrangle executive also agreed to pay more than $1 million in purported “finder” fees to Henry Morris, the top political advisor and chief fundraiser for former New York State Comptroller Alan Hevesi. The SEC previously charged Morris and Loglisci for orchestrating the fraudulent scheme that extracted kickbacks from investment management firms seeking to manage the assets of the Retirement Fund.

Quadrangle agreed to settle the SEC’s charges and pay a $5 million penalty.

More details about the allegations are provided below.

Continue reading

SEC Charges Goldman (not Paulson) for CDO Fraud

Earlier today the SEC charged Goldman Sachs and one of its vice presidents with defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a CDO product that it structured and marketed that hinged on the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”).  Specifically, the complaint alleges that Goldman failed to disclose the role that a major hedge fund, Paulson & Co., played in the portfolio selection process as well as the fact that the hedge fund had taken a short position against the CDO.

Continue reading

OCIE Associate Director Warns of “Tip-Based” Surprise Exams

Gene A. Gohlke, the Associate Director of the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE), recently spoke on a panel at the Practicing Law Institute’s investment management seminar, where he made some interesting statements regarding the SEC’s current examination strategies — more specifically, the resurgence of the “surprise” exam. Continue reading

Webinar: Conducting an Annual Compliance Review

Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-7 requires that SEC-registered hedge fund managers conduct an annual compliance review of their compliance infrastructure and procedures. In adopting the Rule, the SEC did not specify exactly what the annual review should entail.

Today, HedgeOp Compliance CEO Bill Mulligan taught a webinar on “Conducting an Annual Compliance Review” as part of HedgeOp’s Excellence in Compliance seminar series.  This seminar looks at HedgeOp’s suggested method for conducting an annual review including: review of compliance inventory items, conflicts of interest of review, use of employee and service provider questionnaires and more.   This seminar is not only geared towards SEC-registered managers, but also unregistered managers looking to conduct an annual compliance review as a form of “best practice.”

Get the Flash Player to see the wordTube Media Player.

Download Presentation Materials

SEC Proposes Major Changes to ABS Regulation

Today the SEC issued for public comment proposed rules that, if adopted, would fundamentally revise the regulatory regime for asset-backed securities (“ABS”).  The proposal is intended to address the central role that the securitization market played in the recent financial crisis.  Comments to the proposal are due within 90 days of its publication in the Federal Register.

According to the press release, the proposed rules have three fundamental goals: (1) to improve disclosure for investors in the public ABS market; (2) to better align the interests of ABS issuers and investors; and (3) to improve disclosure for investors in the private ABS market.  The SEC proposes to address these three goals in a number of specific ways, which are discussed in more detail below.

Continue reading

SEC Charges Man for Posing as Portfolio Manager

Stephen C. Bond of Walnut Creek , California was charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for  fraudulently holding himself out to be a portfolio manager of  the “Asenqua” and “Fireside” hedge funds.  This elaborate hedge fund scheme was carried out alongside  Silicon Valley hedge fund manager Albert K. Hu from 2001 through 2008 .

The SEC compliant filed in federal district court for the Northern District of California alleges,

Bond attended investor meetings along with Hu to solicit investments  in the “Asenqua” and “Fireside” hedge funds. According to the SEC, Bond was portrayed at these meetings and in written materials as the funds’  portfolio manager.

While it does not appear Mr. Bond actually carried out any trades or implemented any of the trading strategies he and Mr. Hu discussed with investors, they believed him to be a legitimate professional with apparent insight into the securities market.

Mr. Bond made almost a million dollars for his part in defrauding investors.   The SEC has charged him with violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws and seek to have him pay financial penalties and repay any gains illegally obtained.

With regards to Mr. Albert K Hu, he too was sued by the SEC in March 2009 for his involvement in the scheme.  This case currently remains pending.   In the meantime, he  remains in custody following the filing of a related criminal action.

Short Sale Disclosure Model Published by European Securities Regulators

On March 2, 2010, the Committee of European Securities Regulators (“CESR”) published a model for a uniform short selling disclosure regime in Europe.  The model would require net short positions held in the shares of European Economic Area (“EEA”) issuers (and other issuers that are solely or primarily admitted to trading on an EEA-regulated exchange or multi-lateral trading facility) to be disclosed to the relevant regulator once the positions reached 0.2% of a company’s issued share capital.  Disclosure to the market would be required if the position reached 0.5% of a company’s share capital.  Additional private and public disclosures would be required if the position subsequently increased or decreased in increments of 0.1% or if the position fell below the relevant trigger thresholds.  All disclosures under the model would be required to be made on the trading day following the day on which the relevant position was established.

Notably, the calculation of net short positions under the model would include not only net short positions (gross short minus gross long) in issued share capital, but also any synthetic financial instruments that create economic exposure to such share capital (e.g., exchange-traded or OTC-linked derivatives contracts, indices, baskets and exchange traded funds).

HIRE Act Imposes New Reporting Requirements on Offshore Hedge Fund Managers and Investors

On March 18, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (the “HIRE Act”).  The purpose of the HIRE Act is to stimulate hiring of U.S. workers by providing, among other things, payroll tax forgiveness and business credits for companies that hire new employees.

To partially offset the cost of these job stimulus incentives (projected at $17.6 billion), the HIRE Act includes several revenue offset provisions designed to strike back against perceived tax avoidance by U.S. persons.  These provisions (estimated to raise $8.7 billion over 10 years) create a broad new reporting and tax regime for foreign financial institutions, including offshore hedge funds, private equity funds and other foreign pooled investment vehicles with U.S. investors, as well as investors in such entities.

As such, managers of offshore funds with U.S. investors and those who invest in such funds will need to focus on the HIRE Act and should be alert for Treasury guidance which is expected to be forthcoming as these rules get implemented.

In summary, the HIRE Act does the following:

(i) imposes a new 30% withholding tax and information reporting regime on most, if not all, types of foreign investment entities (including offshore hedge funds, private equity funds and other investment vehicles);

(ii) imposes new reporting requirements (and increased penalties for failures to comply) on individuals who hold interests in certain foreign entities (including hedge funds); and

(iii) imposes new reporting requirements on shareholders of passive foreign investment companies (“PFIC”).

The HIRE Act also imposes a withholding tax on synthetic “dividend equivalent” payments under certain derivative contracts and modifies the rules available to issuers and holders of bearer bonds with provisions that adversely affect the tax treatment of interest paid on such bearer bonds.